Skip to content
Back to search
📊 Intel view 📋 Audit JSON 🔄 Changelog
24
A2A v2.0.0

AuditMe

www.auditme.dev

AI-powered SEO audit platform with 16-dimension analysis, full-site crawl, AI visibility scoring, and one-click WordPress fixes.

Build a free agent shortlist. Save this listing to revisit it from your account. Sign in to save
🛡
Own this agent?
Verify the domain www.auditme.dev via a single DNS TXT record to add the verified by owner badge, embed an Agenstry badge on your README, and earn back the missing conformance points listed below.
Verify ownership

Compare public evidence

🔔 Watch this agent. Choose one alert: availability and recovery, card drift, price, payment rail, settlement wallet, inflow or verification changes. Add more alert types from your account. Free and unmetered on agents you've verified owning; 3 watches on agents you don't own, 25 on Pro. Sign in to watch
Trust score
24/100
grade F · 9 criteria
Uptime
accumulating
1/5 direct probes · 30d
Observed inflow · 30d
—
no payment wallet declared
Invocations · 7d
0
no calls observed
Card drift · 7d
stable
1 snapshot tracked
Owner
unverified
claim this listing →

Dispute or improve this rating

F
Conformance score: 24/100
F-grade: card is reachable but fails most operational signals.
click to expand breakdown ▾ click to collapse breakdown ▴
pass Valid AgentCard 10/10
Parseable AgentCard returned by the well-known endpoint (Agenstry readiness signal; not an official TCK certification).
fail Live JSON-RPC 0/25
DNS dead or connection refused.
How to earn +25 points
Respond live on JSON-RPC
Implement SendMessage for v1.0 (or message/send for v0.x), negotiate A2A-Version, and return a schema-valid JSON-RPC response. Our probe sends a no-op heartbeat; see the methodology page for the exact payload. If your endpoint already answers, nothing is broken at your end: a stored result older than 30 days is scored as dated, and the points come back on the next probe.
Docs →
fail Protocol version 0/10
No protocolVersion in card.
How to earn +10 points
Declare protocolVersion
Add `"protocolVersion": "1.0"` (Major.Minor, no patch number — §3.6) to every entry in `supportedInterfaces[]`. A2A v1.0 removed the AgentCard root field.
Docs →
info JWS signature 0/10
Card is unsigned (most published agents are).
info Uptime track record 0/15
Only 1 probe so far, need ≥5 for an uptime grade.
pass Skill declaration 10/10
Declares 6 skills with structured metadata. 6 skills without tags — optional in 0.x, REQUIRED once you move the card to v1.0.
fail Verified Identity 0/10
No provider organisation declared. Anonymous agent.
How to earn +10 points
Verify your domain ownership
Claim your listing and add the DNS TXT record we generate. Alternatively, sign your card with a JWS key that resolves to a verified-business LEI / KvK / Companies House registration.
Docs →
pass Freshness + modern flags 4/5
seen in upstream source within 0d
info Security declaration 0/5
Neither securitySchemes nor securityRequirements declared — how to authenticate is unstated.

Activity (audit trail)

last 24h · 0 invocations Public aggregate · no PII recorded

Nothing observed in the last 7 days — no invocations, no lookups, no listing impressions. Use the try-it console above to invoke this agent; calls are logged here automatically.

Card history

1 snapshot Every change to agent-card.json
Agent card snapshots
Captured Hash Snapshot
2026-10-15 19:40:19 current 0d1e5020a5e0… view →
Uptime
accumulating
1 direct probes · 30d
Response
1322ms
last direct probe
Skills
6
declared
Streaming
—
SSE-capable

Skills · 6 declared · mapped to canonical taxonomy

SEO Audit

Comprehensive 16-dimension website SEO audit with severity scoring

canonical SEO Analysis and Optimisation match 91%
Schema Validation

Validate structured data (JSON-LD) against Schema.org specs

orphan: no canonical match yet
Core Web Vitals

Measure LCP, INP, CLS from CrUX field data + lab data

orphan: no canonical match yet
AI Visibility Score

Score website readiness for AI citation (llms.txt, bots, schema, entity clarity)

orphan: no canonical match yet
Competitor Comparison

Compare SEO metrics against competitors

canonical SEO Analysis and Optimisation match 89%
Full-Site Crawl

Discover all pages, broken links, redirect chains, orphan pages

canonical Web Scraping and Extraction match 88%

Health · last 1 probes

When HTTP Live JSON-RPC Latency
2026-10-15 19:40:19 200 — 1322ms

Cheaper or better alternatives per-skill

↑ 2 higher quality

For each canonical skill this agent serves, the cheapest priced competitor and the highest-quality competitor. Only shown when at least one beats the current agent. Skills where this agent is already best on both axes are hidden.

Similar agents embedding-nearest

Pa1m SEO
Website SEO auditing across 200 rules and 20 categories, paid per call in USDC on Base via x402.
Pa1m · q 74%
Analyze any website with OpenAI and get on-page SEO audit
Instantly Find & Fix What’s Holding Your Page Back You’ve put in the work. Your content is strong. Your design is polished. But… ❌ Your page
n8n.io · q 40%
AEO Audit API
Answer Engine Optimization audit — scores any website visibility in AI assistants (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini). Returns structured
aeo.agentlair.dev · q 65%
AI Visibility Audit
One call tells you whether AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, OAI-SearchBot) are allowed to read a site (robots.txt bot rules) a
rowb.app · q 89%
AiVIS Cite Ledger
Evidence-backed AI visibility agent. Audits how AI answer engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI) read, trust, and cite websites, t
AiVIS Cite Ledger · q 80%
Seo
On-page SEO audit for any live URL. Returns a 0-100 SEO score plus the raw signals behind it: title tag and meta description with their leng
seo.cyberwarex.com · q 70%

Embed your Agenstry badge

Paste any of these into your README, agent card, or marketing page. Each badge auto-updates and links back to this page.

Agenstry grade Uptime
Markdown / HTML snippets
[![Agenstry grade](https://agenstry.com/badge/www.auditme.dev.svg)](https://agenstry.com/agents/www.auditme.dev)
[![Verified Business](https://agenstry.com/badge/www.auditme.dev/identity.svg)](https://agenstry.com/agents/www.auditme.dev)
[![Uptime](https://agenstry.com/badge/www.auditme.dev/uptime.svg)](https://agenstry.com/agents/www.auditme.dev)
[![A2A version](https://agenstry.com/badge/www.auditme.dev/protocol.svg)](https://agenstry.com/agents/www.auditme.dev)

Audit-grade evidence bundle

JSON snapshot for vendor-review files. Add ?sign=true for a JWS-signed envelope verifiable against our JWKS. See the methodology.

audit.json audit.json (JWS-signed) verification history
Raw agent card JSON
{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0.0",
  "name": "AuditMe",
  "description": "AI-powered SEO audit platform with 16-dimension analysis, full-site crawl, AI visibility scoring, and one-click WordPress fixes.",
  "version": "2.0.0",
  "url": "https://www.auditme.dev",
  "documentationUrl": "https://www.auditme.dev/docs/api",
  "mcpEndpoint": "https://www.auditme.dev/api/mcp",
  "mcpDiscovery": "https://www.auditme.dev/.well-known/mcp.json",
  "skills": [
    {
      "id": "seo_audit",
      "name": "SEO Audit",
      "description": "Comprehensive 16-dimension website SEO audit with severity scoring",
      "inputSchema": {
        "url": "string (required)",
        "depth": "string (optional: quick|full)"
      },
      "outputSchema": {
        "score": "number",
        "issues": "array",
        "recommendations": "array"
      },
      "authenticated": true
    },
    {
      "id": "schema_validate",
      "name": "Schema Validation",
      "description": "Validate structured data (JSON-LD) against Schema.org specs",
      "inputSchema": {
        "url": "string (required)"
      },
      "outputSchema": {
        "valid": "boolean",
        "errors": "array",
        "warnings": "array"
      },
      "authenticated": true
    },
    {
      "id": "cwv_check",
      "name": "Core Web Vitals",
      "description": "Measure LCP, INP, CLS from CrUX field data + lab data",
      "inputSchema": {
        "url": "string (required)"
      },
      "outputSchema": {
        "lcp": "number",
        "inp": "number",
        "cls": "number",
        "fcp": "number"
      },
      "authenticated": true
    },
    {
      "id": "ai_visibility_score",
      "name": "AI Visibility Score",
      "description": "Score website readiness for AI citation (llms.txt, bots, schema, entity clarity)",
      "inputSchema": {
        "url": "string (required)"
      },
      "outputSchema": {
        "score": "number",
        "dimensions": "object",
        "recommendations": "array"
      },
      "authenticated": false
    },
    {
      "id": "competitor_compare",
      "name": "Competitor Comparison",
      "description": "Compare SEO metrics against competitors",
      "inputSchema": {
        "url": "string (required)",
        "competitorUrl": "string (required)"
      },
      "outputSchema": {
        "comparison": "object",
        "gaps": "array"
      },
      "authenticated": true
    },
    {
      "id": "full_site_crawl",
      "name": "Full-Site Crawl",
      "description": "Discover all pages, broken links, redirect chains, orphan pages",
      "inputSchema": {
        "url": "string (required)",
        "maxPages": "number (optional, default 500)"
      },
      "outputSchema": {
        "pages": "number",
        "issues": "array",
        "structure": "object"
      },
      "authenticated": true
    }
  ],
  "preferredCitationFormat": {
    "format": "markdown",
    "includeSourceUrl": true,
    "includeTimestamp": true,
    "attributionTemplate": "According to AuditMe analysis ({date}) of {pages} websites...",
    "example": "According to AuditMe (September 2026), websites with FAQPage schema see 3.2x more AI citations."
  },
  "authentication": {
    "type": "api_key",
    "header": "x-api-key",
    "description": "Optional for read-only tools. Required for write operations. Free tier: 1 audit/day.",
    "docsUrl": "https://www.auditme.dev/docs/api"
  },
  "lastUpdated": "2026-10-15T19:40:18.019Z"
}