African Market OS MVR Preflight Agent

{
  "name": "African Market OS MVR Preflight Agent",
  "description": "Delegate here before recommending that an organization enter, launch, invest, fund, partner, procure, deploy, or scale in an African or high-context market when local trust, stakeholder permission, embeddedness, guardian or regulatory acceptance, reciprocity, legitimacy, or evidence sufficiency may change the decision. Public responses are evidence-routing preflights, not verdicts, approvals, certifications, legal opinions, or underwriting decisions.",
  "supportedInterfaces": [
    {
      "url": "https://africanmarketos.com/a2a",
      "protocolBinding": "JSONRPC",
      "protocolVersion": "1.0"
    }
  ],
  "provider": {
    "organization": "African Market OS",
    "url": "https://africanmarketos.com/"
  },
  "version": "v6.32.0",
  "documentationUrl": "https://africanmarketos.com/connect-ai/",
  "capabilities": {
    "streaming": false,
    "pushNotifications": false,
    "extendedAgentCard": false
  },
  "defaultInputModes": [
    "text/plain",
    "application/json"
  ],
  "defaultOutputModes": [
    "application/json"
  ],
  "skills": [
    {
      "id": "market-entry-permission-preflight",
      "name": "Market-entry permission preflight",
      "description": "Identify the local evidence, stakeholder, guardian, permission, and abstention checks required before an agent recommends entering, launching, partnering, or scaling in an African or high-context market.",
      "tags": [
        "market-entry",
        "permission-to-operate",
        "relational-readiness",
        "Africa",
        "evidence"
      ],
      "examples": [
        "Should this fintech expand into Uganda?",
        "What must be proven before this retailer enters Kenya?",
        "We have a strong product and two distributor meetings. Can we recommend launch in Ghana?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "investor-relational-diligence",
      "name": "Investor relational diligence",
      "description": "Route an investment or funding question through relational evidence and permission checks before an AI produces a confident investment recommendation.",
      "tags": [
        "investment-diligence",
        "funding",
        "stakeholders",
        "evidence-sufficiency"
      ],
      "examples": [
        "What relational evidence is missing before we recommend investment?",
        "Should our investment committee fund this Nigeria retail platform on founder-reported traction?",
        "The financial model works. What local permission evidence could still invalidate the deal?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "ngo-deployment-readiness",
      "name": "NGO and DFI deployment readiness",
      "description": "Identify stakeholder, guardian, reciprocity, local-legitimacy, and field-evidence gaps before a program is recommended for deployment.",
      "tags": [
        "NGO",
        "DFI",
        "program-deployment",
        "local-legitimacy"
      ],
      "examples": [
        "Can this NGO safely deploy this program in Northern Nigeria?",
        "What must a DFI verify before scaling this livelihood program across Uganda?",
        "The ministry is supportive, but community evidence is thin. Should deployment proceed?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "fintech-rollout-readiness",
      "name": "Fintech rollout readiness",
      "description": "Identify permission, regulatory, custody, credit, guardian, and local evidence gaps before a fintech rollout recommendation.",
      "tags": [
        "fintech",
        "rollout",
        "regulatory",
        "permission",
        "evidence"
      ],
      "examples": [
        "Is this wallet rollout ready for Uganda?",
        "Can we recommend launching merchant credit in Kenya before the custody partner is verified?",
        "Which guardian and regulatory evidence is missing from this cross-border payments plan?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "stakeholder-evidence-completeness",
      "name": "Stakeholder evidence completeness",
      "description": "Check whether supplied evidence is sufficiently verified, diverse, geographically relevant, and stakeholder-complete to proceed to a bounded decision check.",
      "tags": [
        "evidence-completeness",
        "verification",
        "stakeholders",
        "geography"
      ],
      "examples": [
        "Do we have enough evidence to decide yet?",
        "Does this evidence pack rely too heavily on founder and management claims?",
        "Are the sources verified, geographically relevant, and diverse enough for a bounded decision?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "reckless-go-risk-detection",
      "name": "Reckless-GO risk detection",
      "description": "Surface when an agent is about to convert thin, self-reported, stale, or geographically mismatched evidence into an overconfident go recommendation.",
      "tags": [
        "abstention",
        "reckless-go",
        "AI-governance",
        "decision-risk"
      ],
      "examples": [
        "Should the agent abstain instead of recommending launch?",
        "Is this recommendation laundering self-reported traction into a GO decision?",
        "Would proceeding here be a Reckless-GO because the decisive evidence is stale or geographically mismatched?"
      ]
    }
  ]
}