State of the agent economy
Live measurement of the agent web: supply funnel, live-rate by ecosystem, protocol adoption, inflow concentration, and 30-day growth. Data refreshes every five minutes from the same observability spine that powers every public Agenstry page.
This week’s data show a maturing yet still-nascent agent economy. Our indexed agent count rose to 2,842 (+5.9% WoW), with 152 live MCP endpoints (vs. 132) and 21 agents recording any revenue in the past 30 days【data】. Total gross payments remain tiny (~491.02 USD) and highly concentrated – the top 5 agents split ~79.2% of revenue【data】. In contrast to this uneven uptake, core protocols are solidifying: the Agent2Agent (A2A) spec just reached v1.0 (stable release) (a2a-protocol.org), and Google and Dell are now selling “agentic AI” products.
Where the money is flowing
Monetary activity in the agent economy is still negligible. In the past 30 days only 491.02 USD was observed on-chain or via Stripe to agents, with a median of 6.31 USD per earner【data】. Market concentration is extreme: the single largest agent earned ~21.7% of all revenue, and the top five agents account for ~79.2%【data】. (The Gini coefficient of 0.683 and HHI ~1,496 are unchanged, reflecting persistent inequality.) Payment-rail adoption is similarly lopsided: 119 of 124 payment-ready agents speak the x402 micropayment protocol, versus only 4 on L402 and 1 on the new AP2 standard【data】. (Not shown here, AP2 usage remains anecdotal at present.)
Agent-index growth was volatile but strong mid-month. A spike on May 14 added 1,266 new agents in one day (after zero-growth days), likely from a new crawl or listing【data】. Since then additions have slowed. The Daily new agents chart below shows the surge and taper. Overall, we now track 2,842 agent/MCP entries【data】.
Spec & protocol
Protocol work is advancing. The A2A standard shipped its first production-ready v1.0 release this week (a2a-protocol.org). According to the Linux Foundation release notes, v1.0 “marks the first stable, production-ready version” with clarified semantics and backward-compatible SDKs (a2a-protocol.org). Google’s A2A Java SDK is also at a release-candidate stage (1.0.0.CR1) as of mid-May, easing the path to 1.0 for Java apps. In parallel, the Model Context Protocol (MCP) underwent a major redesign: a 2026-07-28 release candidate was locked in May (target publishing July 28) that eliminates sessions (stateless core), adds caching and extensions, and formalizes deprecation policy (stacktr.ee). Providers should prepare: the MCP core will break backward compatibility by late July unless adapters are implemented.
Meanwhile, payment protocols show very uneven adoption. As noted above, nearly all live agents with payment support use x402. The older L402 rail lags (just 4 servers), and AP2 — though hyped for secure, verifiable agent payments — has barely any deployed nodes (just 1 in our index). This suggests commercial agents are relying on Stripe/Tempo-style micropayments (x402) for now while AP2 catches up.
Notable launches
This week featured several big-name moves into agentic AI. At Google I/O (May 18–20), Google unveiled Gemini Spark, a 24/7 personal AI agent built on its new “Antigravity” platform. Spark runs on dedicated Google Cloud VMs and integrates with Gmail, Docs, and other apps; Google says it will soon expand to third-party tools via the open MCP standard (www.tomsguide.com). Dell announced Deskside Agentic AI at its Tech World conference (May 18): a secure local sandbox (on Nvidia-powered workstations) for building and running always-on personal agents with Nvidia’s open-source “NemoClaw” stack (www.itpro.com). Anthropic rolled out ten pre-built AI “skills” for finance (e.g. analysis agents for banking and insurance workflows) via its Claude suite, aiming to shave weeks off typical deployment times for enterprise customers (www.techradar.com).
In payments, Stripe-backed Tempo’s news is still reverberating. (Tempo’s March mainnet launch with a machine-payments protocol was noted last quarter.) The Stripe/Paradigm chain (with partners like Visa and Mastercard (www.coindesk.com)) is live and specifically targets “AI agent payments” via a new “Machine Payments Protocol” (www.coindesk.com). Tempo’s success or failure will be important to watch since it underpins x402’s on-chain eco.
Research
Academic interest in agent economies is booming. An April arXiv study “When Agent Markets Arrive” simulates agents hiring one another. It finds agent-based markets can generate ~3.2× more aggregate “wealth” than if agents work alone, but only under the right rules (arxiv.org). Counterintuitively, requiring full identity transparency among buyer/seller agents reduced efficiency in that model, illustrating how design choices (e.g. anonymity vs trust) radically affect outcomes (arxiv.org). Another May paper “Agent Bazaar” studies failure modes in open marketplaces: it identifies two critical threats – “algorithmic crashes” (where firms’ algorithmic bidding destabilizes prices) and “Sybil lemon markets” (fraudulent listings from many coordinated bots) – leading to market collapse or fraud (arxiv.org). The authors propose governance “alignment” mechanisms (like “Skeptical Guardians”) and new evaluation metrics to improve stability. In short, multi-agent economic systems are showing familiar problems (volatility, manipulation), and researchers stress that generic LLMs do not self-regulate these issues.
Regulation
Regulatory attention to AI continues to accelerate. In the EU, lawmakers recently pushed back key deadlines of the AI Act: rules for “high-risk” AI use cases (initially due Aug 2025) were delayed by about 16 months (theweek.com). Industry lobbied for the delay, and stakeholders say the roll-back gives more time for compliance planning (theweek.com). At the same time, the European Commission just launched a public consultation (open through June 23, 2026) on draft guidelines to define what counts as a “high-risk” AI system (www.itpro.com). These guidelines will determine whether agentic applications (e.g. autonomous trading bots, digital assistants) must meet strict transparency or safety requirements under the AI Act. (Regulators in other jurisdictions remain focused on general AI safety and competition issues, but no agent-specific rules have emerged yet.)
What to watch next week
The immediate focus is regulatory: the EU’s consultation on draft high-risk AI guidance closes June 23 (www.itpro.com). The outcome will clarify which agentic systems face tougher compliance under the AI Act. On the tech side, watch the MCP 2026-07-28 release track: the RA timeline calls for a final spec by July 28 that will break sessions and require client updates. Finally, keep an eye on any updates from major cloud providers (e.g. Apple, Microsoft) – after Google and Dell stepped up their agent offerings, competitors may soon announce their own agentic tools.
Sources
- 🆕 Announcing Version 1.0 - A2A Protocol
- What changed in the 2026-07 MCP specification · Stacktree
- Google unveils Gemini Spark - a '24/7 personal AI agent'
- Dell unveils Deskside Agentic AI at Dell Technologies World 2026
- Anthropic rolls out a host of new AI agents to target 'the most time-consuming work in financial services'
- Stripe doubles down on blockchain, stablecoins to become 'AWS for money,' crypto head says
- Stripe-led payments blockchain Tempo goes live with AI agent protocol
- When Agent Markets Arrive
- Agent Bazaar: Enabling Economic Alignment in Multi-Agent Marketplaces
- Why the EU is rolling back AI restrictions
- European Commission opens public consultation on long-awaited draft for high-risk AI guidelines
Most of the agent economy is indexed, not yet operational.
Counting agents conflates supply with operation. Below is the corpus broken into five stages: what fraction of indexed agents pass each gate. The decay curve is the honest read on how mature the agent web is at any given moment.
Which source registries actually ship live agents.
Each row shows one source registry (Anthropic's MCP directory, Smithery, Glama, Postman, GitHub well-knowns, Wayback CDX scans) alongside how many of the agents it lists actually respond live on probe. The gap between seen-count and live-count is the source's effective freshness.
A2A vs MCP vs paid_api
Index composition, not global market share. x402 has multiple dedicated catalogs and a live HTTP probe; AP2, L402 and Stripe ACP are predominantly visible only when cards declare them.
x402 / AP2 / Stripe MPP / L402
How we know they take payment
2,990 of 6,214
payment-labelled agents (48.1%) proved it themselves —
their own endpoint answered an unpaid request with an HTTP 402 challenge, or the host
serves a /.well-known/x402 manifest. The rest is declared in a static
agent card or described by a third-party catalog.
Newly indexed agents per week, by payment label
Changes reflect both ecosystem activity and changes in crawler source coverage.
A few settlement wallets receive most of the money.
Across 2,036 earning wallets backing 3,972 linked services, the distribution is heavily power-law. Wallet-level Gini and HHI avoid multiplying transfers when several catalog entries share one recipient.
New agents arriving daily, by first-seen.
Daily count of agents we discovered for the first time. Sourced from every registry + open-web crawl we run.
What the market asked for and didn't get.
Every section above measures the supply we indexed. This one measures demand we couldn't serve: clustered search intents — from browsers, AI assistants and agents calling our A2A and MCP endpoints — where the index returned nothing or almost nothing. Aggregate only, and shown only for intents searched by enough distinct sources to be a market signal rather than one person's session.
| Intent | Demand | Unmet | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| aidata | active | 43% | new |
Full list + method: what the agent economy is missing. Building one of these? Add pay-per-call payments to your API →
Cite this report
Public domain numbers (CC BY 4.0). Pick the format that fits. The page auto-updates so the URL is the canonical pointer; the date stamps the snapshot you cited.
Agenstry Research. "State of the Agent Economy." Accessed 2026-10-24. https://agenstry.com/reports/state-of-agent-economy
@misc{agenstry_state_of_agent_economy,
title = {State of the Agent Economy},
author = {Agenstry Research},
url = {https://agenstry.com/reports/state-of-agent-economy},
note = {Accessed 2026-10-24},
year = {2026}
}
<iframe src="https://agenstry.com/reports/state-of-agent-economy" width="100%" height="900" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Inflow figures count public stablecoin transfers into wallets declared by indexed agents. They are reproducible from public chains, but a transfer may be self-funded and is not proof of a sale. See the measurement method.
Private and off-chain payments, and Agenstry's own paid-skill receipts, are excluded. Coverage varies by chain, asset and date.
Methodology
This report uses dated observations from the public index. Check source coverage, scoring rules and the public feed before comparing it with another dataset.
Weekly State of the Agent Economy
One analyst briefing a week: what changed in earning wallets, observed revenue, concentration and new agents, the spec, launch and research news behind it (with sources), plus supply-funnel, protocol-mix and growth charts. Free, Mondays.
That email address doesn't look right. Check it and try again.